INGESTED160 FILESLAST DISCLOSURE 15h ago
← Files
DISCLOSURE / FILE

Reticle-Centered Object, Timestamp Unreliable

FBI Photo B3

A single redacted still image from an unidentified U.S. military sensor system, submitted by the FBI to AARO, showing a small dark circular object near a targeting reticle over a western U.S. background.

Brief

The FBI forwarded to AARO a monochrome still image, derived from an unnamed U.S. military system, capturing a small dark circular object positioned just right of center on a crosshair reticle against what appears to be a mountain range or cloud formation. The image was redacted prior to AARO submission; no mission report accompanied it. The operator on record could not positively identify the phenomenon. The embedded timestamp is unreliable because the source system's date and time were never configured.

Metadata

Agency
FBI
Release
5/8/26
Incident
Late 2025
Location
Western United States
Type
PDF • .pdf
Length
1 pages
Classification
UNCLASSIFIED
Tags
circular object, monochrome still image, military optical imaging, Western United States, 2025, crosshair reticle, mountain or cloud background, redacted prior to AARO submission

Key points

  • The image originated from a U.S. military system and was redacted before being forwarded to AARO — the unaltered original has not been released.p.1
  • No accompanying mission report was provided, leaving the operational context — platform, altitude, tasking — entirely unknown.p.1
  • The operator could not positively identify the UAP at time of observation.p.1
  • The embedded date/time in the image is incorrect; the source system's clock was never set, making temporal correlation with other data unreliable.p.1
  • The phenomenon appears as a small, dark, circular object displaced slightly right of a central crosshair reticle in a monochrome, grainy frame.p.1
  • The background suggests a mountain range or cloud formation consistent with a western U.S. aerial or elevated vantage point.p.1

Most interesting

  • The FBI — not a conventional military intelligence branch — was the submitting agency, which is unusual for AARO reports derived from military sensor systems.
  • Redactions were applied to the image before it reached AARO, meaning the oversight body received a pre-sanitized version rather than the raw sensor output.
  • The corrupted timestamp removes one of the most basic anchors for cross-correlating the sighting with radar, satellite, or other contemporaneous data.
  • The object's shape — small and circular — is consistent with a class of UAP morphology that has appeared in other AARO-catalogued cases, though no analytical judgment as to nature or significance has been offered.
  • The absence of a mission report is notable: standard military imaging operations typically generate accompanying documentation that would record platform identity, heading, altitude, and sensor settings.

Cross-references

Document · PDF

Inline viewer is desktop-only. Open the source document in a new tab.

Open document →