INGESTED160 FILESLAST DISCLOSURE 16h ago
← Files
DISCLOSURE / FILE

Four Objects In Sequence, Arabian Gulf ISR 2020

DOW-UAP-D3, Mission Report, Arabian Gulf, 2020

A U.S. Air Force MISREP filed under AFCENT documenting a 2020 Arabian Gulf sighting of four UAP observed in sequential formation by an ISR asset.

Brief

Four UAP were observed at approximately 1736Z during an ISR mission over the Arabian Gulf in 2020, reported by a U.S. Air Force crew operating under AFCENT. The objects appeared sequentially — one at 17:36:22, two side by side at 17:36:30, and one more at 17:36:49 — a pattern the war.gov description characterizes as 'a line of dots followed by a trailing dot.' Cloud coverage prevented a clear visual track, and ISR imagery cross-referenced as 'ISR 1' was collected. The standardized UAP fields formally record no advanced capabilities or recovered materials.

Metadata

Agency
Department of War
Release
5/8/26
Type
PDF • .pdf
Length
7 pages
Classification
SECRET//REL TO USA, FVEY
Tags
4 objects, sequential formation, 1+2+1 pattern, Arabian Gulf, 2020, ISR asset, AFCENT, CENTCOM AOR, cloud-obstructed visual

Key points

  • Four UAP were observed beneath a redacted sensor platform in the Arabian Gulf at approximately 1736Z, with sub-minute timestamps for each appearance.p.7
  • Two of the four UAP appeared side by side simultaneously at 17:36:30, flanked by solo objects 8 seconds before and 19 seconds after, producing a 1+2+1 sequential formation.p.7
  • Cloud coverage directly obstructed the observing platform from maintaining visual continuity on the objects.p.7
  • ISR imagery was collected and cross-referenced as 'ISR 1,' indicating a companion sensor file exists outside this MISREP.p.7
  • The structured 'UAP Advanced Capabilities And/Or Materials' field is answered 'NO,' a formal negative finding on the standardized checklist.p.6
  • The report is classified SECRET//REL TO USA, FVEY and carries a declassification date of June 3, 2048 — 28 years after the event.p.1
  • All personnel identifiers (rank, name, unit, wing, phone, email) are redacted under both (b)(6) personal privacy and (b)(3) 10 U.S.C. §130b.p.2
  • The mission was tasked to the U.S. Air Force under AFCENT, placing it within the CENTCOM area of responsibility.p.1

Verbatim

  • 4X UAP OBSERVED FLYING IN (b)(1)1.4a FOV. CLOUD COVERAGE OBSTRUCTED (b)(1)1.4a FROM FOLLOWING AND GETTING A CLEAR VISUAL. (SEE ISR 1).
    p.7
  • AT APPROX 1736Z 4 UAP WERE OBSERVED BENEATH (b)(1)1.4a 1X UAP OBSERVED AT 17:36:22, 2X UAP OBSERVED SIDE BY SIDE AT 17:36:30, AND 1X UAP OBSERVED AT 17:36:49.
    p.7
  • UAP Advanced Capabilities And/Or Materials (yes/no; if yes, describe): NO
    p.6
  • (SECRET//REL TO USA, FVEY) WEATHER WAS (NOT) A FACTOR (EXPLAIN WHY IF IT WAS)
    p.4
  • Declassification Date (YYYYMMDD): 20480603
    p.1
  • Country Tasked: US - UNITED STATES • Service Tasked: A - AIR FORCE
    p.2

Most interesting

  • The declassification date of June 3, 2048 means this report stays protected for 28 years after the 2020 event, suggesting the operational context — platform type, mission, location specifics — remains sensitive far beyond a typical tactical report.
  • The 27-second observation window (17:36:22 to 17:36:49) with distinct sub-second timestamps implies active sensor tracking rather than a passive visual scan, yet the platform identity and sensor type are entirely redacted.
  • The war.gov description characterizes the formation as 'a line of dots followed by a trailing dot,' consistent with the 1+2+1 sequential appearance documented in the GENTEXT.
  • The entire ACEQUIP section — radar, radar warning receiver, missile warning system, ECM, chaff, flares, missiles, gun, targeting pod — is redacted under (b)(1)1.4a, making it impossible to determine the observing aircraft type or its sensor configuration.
  • Page 5 of 7 produced no extractable text, leaving a gap in the structured data fields between the mission timeline (page 4) and the off-station/UAP event section (page 6).
  • The MISREP form itself includes a dedicated 'UAP Objects/Material Recovered' field, confirming that physical recovery was a standard question on all UAP MISREPs routed through this reporting pipeline.

Cross-references

Document · PDF

Inline viewer is desktop-only. Open the source document in a new tab.

Open document →