03 · SCHOLARLY
304 FILES·LAST 5D AGO
← Scholarly / Papers
SCHOLARLY / PAPER

New Assumptions to Guide SETI Research

Silvano P. Colombano

NASA Technical Reports Server · 2018

A NASA Ames researcher argues SETI's four foundational assumptions are unjustified given exoplanet age data and AI trajectory, and proposes treating UFO reports as a low signal-to-noise data set amenable to formal analysis.

SharePostReddit

Brief

Colombano (2018) opens with Kepler mission findings showing Earth-analogue planetary systems as old as 11.2 Gyr (Kepler-444) and 10.4 Gyr (Kepler-10), implying some civilizations could be up to 6 Gyr more technologically advanced than Earth's. He identifies four SETI assumptions he considers unsupported under that timescale: that interstellar travel is impossible, that radio remains the dominant communication medium, that intelligence must be carbon-based, and that Earth has not been visited. The paper proposes applying a signal-in-noise framework to UFO databases, including 130,000 pages of declassified Air Force records and the NUFORC database, as a parallel SETI investigative track, and calls for interdisciplinary work spanning speculative physics, AI futurism, and techno-sociology.

Metadata

Category
Search
Venue
NASA Technical Reports Server
Type
NASA technical report
Year
2018
Authors
Silvano P. Colombano
Access
Open access
Length
99.2 K
Programs
Kepler Mission, NUFORC
Instruments
Kepler Space Telescope
Data sources
Kepler planetary catalog, NUFORC database, USAF declassified documents (130,000 pages)
Tags
SETI, technosignature, UAP-data, post-biological-intelligence, interstellar-travel, astrobiology, exoplanets

Key points

  • Kepler-444 hosts a planetary system 11.2 Gyr old; Kepler-10 hosts one 10.4 Gyr old, both predating our solar system by roughly 6 Gyr, meaning some civilizations have had orders of magnitude more development time than humanity.p.1
  • Colombano argues radio detection is impractical for advanced civilizations: information packing density would render signals indistinguishable from noise unless a civilization deliberately built a backward-compatible beacon.p.1
  • The carbon-life assumption is challenged on the grounds that post-biological machine intelligence, already foreseeable after 50 years of computing, would remove lifespan and mass constraints on interstellar travel entirely.p.1
  • UFO data is explicitly proposed for SETI-style signal-in-noise analysis, framing the existing UFO literature not as proof of visitation but as a noisy channel that may contain low-amplitude anomalous signals.p.1
  • Four recommended research directions: (1) speculative physics grounded in solid theory, (2) AI and evolvable robotics futurism, (3) techno-sociological modeling of communication choices, and (4) formal UFO study.p.2
  • Named data sources for Big Data analysis: 130,000 pages of declassified U.S. Air Force documents, the National UFO Reporting Center Database, and unspecified international databases.p.2
  • The paper speculates that a post-biological explorer might be 'an extremely tiny super-intelligent entity,' dramatically reducing the energy cost of interstellar travel relative to biological-crew assumptions.p.1

Verbatim

  • earth like planets could exist that are 6 Gyr, older than our own.
    p.1
  • we can surmise that we might have a real problem in predicting technological evolution even for the next thousand years, let alone 6 Million times that amount!
    p.1

Most interesting

  • Colombano calculates that a civilization 6 Gyr ahead of Earth would have had roughly 6,000,000 times longer to develop technology than humanity has, a ratio he explicitly names as making any prediction about their capabilities meaningless.
  • The paper originates from inside NASA Ames and was published on the NASA Technical Reports Server, giving it institutional provenance unusual for a document that formally argues UFO reports deserve scientific study.
  • Colombano treats Earth visitation not as a fringe claim but as SETI's fourth falsifiable assumption, structurally equivalent to the interstellar travel and radio-communication assumptions the field already debates openly.
  • The author raises suspended animation and multi-generational missions as carbon-biology workarounds for interstellar travel before pivoting to the stronger argument that post-biological intelligence faces neither constraint.
  • The paper implies that a beacon deliberately designed to be detectable by radio-era civilizations would represent a technological regression, a deliberate downgrade by a far more advanced sender.

Cross-references