01 · US DISCLOSURE
549 FILES·LAST 6D AGO
← Files
DISCLOSURE / FILE

GEIPAN Case 2009-07-02361 — RIXHEIM (68) 26.07.2009

A GEIPAN investigation record of a single-witness visual observation in Rixheim, France on 26 July 2009, in which a white luminous point executing apparent direction change and acceleration was classified D1 — unexplained due to insufficient data.

Brief

On the evening of 26 July 2009 at approximately 22:20, a witness seated on a terrace in Rixheim (Haut-Rhin, département 68) observed a white luminous point moving linearly from south to north at an elevation between 25° and 35°, initially consistent with a satellite pass. After averting gaze for one to two seconds, the point was no longer where the orbital trajectory predicted; the description cites a direction change and acceleration. GEIPAN assigned classification D1, indicating the case remains unexplained despite being assessed as 'not very strange.' Supporting materials include gendarmerie procès-verbaux and technical notes produced under CNES's GEIPAN program.

Metadata

Agency
GEIPAN / CNES
Release
2007-03-22
Type
PDF • .pdf
Length
4 pages
Classification
UNCLASSIFIED
Programs
GEIPAN, CNES
Tags
white luminous point, direction change, acceleration, naked-eye visual, south-to-north trajectory, Rixheim Haut-Rhin France, 2009, GEIPAN D1, satellite-like

Key points

  • Incident occurred 26 July 2009 at roughly 22:20, Rixheim, Haut-Rhin (68), Alsace, France.
  • Single civilian witness observing the night sky from a private terrace; no instrumentation — naked-eye only.
  • Object described as a white luminous point at 25°–35° elevation executing a south-to-north linear trajectory lasting 7–8 seconds before the anomalous behavior.
  • After a 1–2 second lapse in attention, the object was no longer on the expected trajectory; GEIPAN's description attributes this to a direction change and acceleration.
  • GEIPAN classification D1: case is unexplained because available data are insufficient to assign a natural or prosaic cause, not because anomalous performance is confirmed.
  • Case file includes gendarmerie procès-verbaux, placing the initial report through official law-enforcement channels before GEIPAN intake.
  • The listed release date of 2007-03-22 predates the 2009 incident by nearly two years, indicating a metadata anomaly in the source listing.

Most interesting

  • GEIPAN's D1 classification is the agency's lowest-confidence unexplained tier: the phenomenon is not confirmed anomalous, but the data are too sparse to rule out anything.
  • France's GEIPAN (Groupe d'Études et d'Informations sur les Phénomènes Aérospatiaux Non-identifiés), operating under CNES, is one of the only standing government UAP investigation units in the world that publishes its case files publicly.
  • The witness's initial satellite-misidentification is consistent with GEIPAN's own statistical baseline: the majority of its caseload resolves as re-entries, balloons, or satellites — making the residual unexplained fraction meaningful rather than a classification artifact.
  • Rixheim sits in the Rhine plain near the German and Swiss borders, a geography that makes cross-border air traffic, military flight corridors, and amateur rocketry plausible prosaic candidates — none of which GEIPAN ruled in or out given the data gap.
  • The gendarmerie procès-verbal as a collection instrument reflects France's formal legal chain for UAP intake: local police take the initial sworn statement before GEIPAN receives it, lending evidentiary weight absent in many other countries' UAP reporting pipelines.

Related research

SharePostReddit
Document · PDF

Inline viewer is desktop-only. Open the source document in a new tab.

Open document →