INGESTED160 FILESLAST DISCLOSURE 15h ago
← Files
DISCLOSURE / FILE

Two Objects, Timestamp Corrupted, No Mission Report

FBI Photo B13

A single redacted still image from an unidentified U.S. military imaging system, submitted by the FBI to AARO, showing two small dark elongated objects in the bottom-right quadrant of a monochrome frame; no mission report accompanies it.

Brief

The FBI submitted this UAP report to AARO consisting of one still image captured by a U.S. military system in late 2025 over the western United States. The original imagery was redacted prior to submission, and no accompanying mission report was provided. The operator was unable to positively identify the objects. The timestamp embedded in the image is unreliable because the system's internal clock was not correctly set.

Metadata

Agency
FBI
Release
5/8/26
Incident
Late 2025
Location
Western United States
Type
PDF • .pdf
Length
1 pages
Classification
UNCLASSIFIED
Programs
AARO
Tags
elongated objects, two objects, monochrome still image, military imaging system, Western United States, 2025, AARO submission, redacted source

Key points

  • Source imagery was redacted by the FBI before submission to AARO; the unaltered original is not part of this release.
  • No mission report was provided alongside the image, leaving operational context — altitude, platform type, and mission profile — unknown.
  • The embedded date/time metadata in the image is explicitly flagged as incorrect due to the system clock not being set, undermining any timeline reconstruction from the file itself.
  • The operator on record could not positively identify the UAP at the time of capture.
  • Two small, dark, elongated objects appear near the center of the frame, displaced into the bottom-right quadrant; no size, speed, or altitude data accompanies the image.
  • The image is monochrome and grainy, with a simplified central crosshair overlay consistent with a targeting or surveillance reticle.

Most interesting

  • The FBI — a domestic law-enforcement agency — is the submitting body, suggesting the military system involved may have been operating in a domestic or joint-operation context.
  • The deliberate redaction of the original imagery before AARO submission means AARO itself received a degraded evidentiary record, not the raw capture.
  • The war.gov listing includes an explicit disclaimer that the narrative description does not constitute an analytical judgment or investigative conclusion — an unusually prominent hedge for a government release page.
  • Two elongated objects rather than one complicates single-object natural explanations such as a weather balloon or lens artifact.
  • The absence of a mission report is notable: standard military imagery releases are paired with sortie or sensor logs; its omission here is either a redaction decision or a documentation gap.

Cross-references

Document · PDF

Inline viewer is desktop-only. Open the source document in a new tab.

Open document →