Two Unidentified Objects, Operator Baffled, No Context
FBI Photo B22
An FBI-submitted, redacted still image from a U.S. military system showing two small, dark, elongated objects that the operator could not positively identify, released to AARO with no accompanying mission report.
Brief
The FBI submitted a single redacted still image to AARO derived from a U.S. military system, depicting two small, dark, elongated objects near the center of the frame in the upper right quadrant of a monochrome, grainy scene with a simplified central crosshair. The operator was unable to positively identify the objects. No accompanying mission report was provided, stripping the image of operational context. The embedded timestamp is unreliable because the imaging system's date and time were never properly configured.
Metadata
- Agency
- FBI
- Release
- 5/8/26
- Incident
- Late 2025
- Location
- Western United States
- Type
- PDF • .pdf
- Length
- 1 pages
- Classification
- UNCLASSIFIED
- Programs
- AARO
- Tags
- elongated objects, monochrome still image, military imaging system, western United States, 2025, FBI submission, redacted imagery, AARO
Key points
- The FBI, rather than a military branch, was the submitting agency despite the imagery originating from a U.S. military system.
- The original imagery was altered with redactions before submission to AARO, meaning the resolution office received a degraded version of the source material.
- No accompanying mission report was provided with the image.
- The operator reported being unable to positively identify the UAP.
- The date displayed in the image is incorrect due to the system's clock not having been set — the timestamp cannot be used to establish incident timing.
- Two small, dark, elongated objects are visible near the center of the frame in the upper right quadrant.
- The image is monochrome with a grainy texture and a simplified central crosshair, consistent with military targeting or surveillance optics.
Most interesting
- The FBI served as the submitting agency for imagery sourced from a U.S. military system — an organizational handoff that raises questions about chain of custody and why the originating military unit did not file directly with AARO.
- Redactions were applied to the imagery before it reached AARO, meaning the oversight body mandated to resolve UAP cases received a pre-filtered product rather than the raw source.
- The system clock was never properly configured, rendering the embedded timestamp unreliable and leaving the incident's precise date dependent entirely on the operator's after-the-fact recollection.
- The absence of a mission report means there is no documented record of what the operator was doing, the platform's location, altitude, heading, or tasking at the time of the observation.