GEIPAN Case 2011-02-02732 — [A62] de AGEN (47) vers BORDEAUX (33) 15.02.2011
GEIPAN standard-questionnaire case file for a February 2011 motorist sighting of a static, flat, rounded-triangle greenish object over the A62 highway between Agen and Bordeaux, classified D1 (unexplained).
Brief
On 15 February 2011 at approximately 9:15 AM, a 41-year-old female motorist driving at 120–130 km/h on the A62 between Agen and Bordeaux observed a stationary, flat, triangular object with rounded corners and a greenish-gray color positioned just above treetop height. The sighting lasted only a few seconds; her two adolescent daughters, drowsy in the back seat, failed to observe the object before the car passed it. No corroborating witnesses were ever reported. GEIPAN classified the case D1 — unexplained — and the completed questionnaire forms the core evidentiary record.
Metadata
- Agency
- GEIPAN / CNES
- Release
- 2007-03-22
- Type
- PDF • .pdf
- Length
- 21 pages
- Classification
- D1 (GEIPAN classification — Unexplained)
- Programs
- GEIPAN, GEPAN, SEPRA
- Tags
- triangular, rounded corners, flat profile, greenish-gray, stationary/hovering, treetop altitude, A62 highway, Agen-Bordeaux corridor, 2011, D1 classification, GEIPAN, visual only
Key points
- Object described as triangular with three rounded corners, rather flat, and greenish in color (between gray and green); it appeared stationary throughout the sighting.p.4
- Observation time approximately 9:15 AM on 15 February 2011; duration estimated at 'quelques secondes' (a few seconds).p.3
- Witness initially interpreted the object as a hovering raptor (bird of prey) hunting prey, only recognizing it as unidentified upon drawing level with it.p.4
- Altitude estimated at roughly treetop level; a 'très grand arbre' (very large tree) was noted directly beneath the object.p.10
- No other witnesses: the witness's two daughters were drowsy and failed to turn in time before the car had already passed.p.4
- Meteorological conditions: clear blue sky with a few small white clouds and weak sunlight; no atmospheric change before, during, or after the observation.p.8
- Sole observational method was naked-eye visual from a moving vehicle; no photographs, video, or electronic sensor data were captured.p.3
- GEIPAN's cover letter confirms that all questionnaire materials and conclusions are published anonymously on the CNES-GEIPAN public website.p.2
Verbatim
un objet de forme triangulaire aux trois angles arrondis , plutôt plat et de couleur verdâtre (entre le gris et le vert). Il ne semblait pas immense et restait statique, figé.
p.4je m'aperçus en fait que sur les trois oiseaux, l'un d'entre eux faisait du sur place alors que les deux autres volaient et étaient un peu plus loin.
p.4Mon réflexe a été de crier « les filles…réveillez vous regardez dans le ciel derrière, viiite !!!! »
p.4Je me pose des questions tout en restant très terre à terre et d'y trouver peut-être une solution logique…mais c'est le point d'interrogation ?
p.5le GEIPAN travaille à collecter, analyser et étudier rigoureusement les témoignages recueillis lors d'observations de Phénomènes Aérospatiaux Non identifiés (PAN) tout en garantissant aux témoins une absolue discrétion.
p.2Un ciel bleu clair avec quelques petits nuages blancs. Un faible soleil. Pas de changement au cours de l'observation
p.8J'étais en voiture sur l'autoroute, donc il n'y avait pas d'habitations ;.Une plaine avec quelques arbres. Et là où se trouvait l'objet, il y avait un énorme arbre en dessous
p.10
Most interesting
- The witness spontaneously rationalized the stationary object as a hovering raptor — a cognitively plausible misidentification given the rural motorway setting — before proximity forced her to abandon that explanation.
- Despite the sighting occurring on a major French autoroute (A62, a high-traffic corridor connecting Agen and Bordeaux), no independent witnesses reported the same phenomenon.
- The object's reported altitude — just above large roadside trees — places it in low-altitude airspace where conventional aircraft would be anomalous and where visual detail would be clearest.
- GEIPAN's D1 classification signals the case remained unexplained after analysis; GEIPAN's taxonomy distinguishes fully identified (A), probably identified (B), insufficient data (C), and unexplained (D) cases.
- The GEIPAN questionnaire format used here (Standard Individual V2.00) is a structured instrument designed to elicit precise spatial, temporal, and perceptual data from civilian witnesses — an example of the French state's institutionalized, scientific approach to UAP investigation unique among Western governments at the time.